SPEAKER: Linda is a member of AWSA, and is available to speak to your organization, at your conference, or as part of a workshop.
Contact her at

AGENT: Linda is a an agent with Hartline Literary Agency. She would love to represent that next great American novel! She will look at nonfiction, but she LOVES FICTION--historic, suspense, romance or all of the above.

AUTHOR: Linda writes romance in all categories, but what is her fave? Suspense, and not only suspense, but SUSPENSE SEALED WITH A KISS

Monday, April 11, 2011


Gee, here's a great topic. Errghhh!

Okay, so this week brought a lot of cheers and even more BIG SIGHS!

A lot of discussion within groups are centered around: But this one scored me very high and this one at the bottom of the heap! What gives?

Imagine going to a job interview:
"Do you have any experience? No? We can't hire you."
"But how do I get experience if you won't hire me?"
A rather large shoulder shrug. And therein lies part of the problem with finding new judges. We need to have new folks to judge, but they have to start somewhere and often have to learn merely by experience. And rarely get so much as a pat on the back for all the hard work.

Contests are increasing in size each year, and new judges are needed to replace those who are overworked, overtired, and fed up because they don't want to take any more complaints. It is discouraging to find such a diversity between judge #1 and judge #3, but we have judges from all genres, all different backgrounds, and all doing their best. I wish the organizations had mentoring programs for their new judges. That might help with some of the discrepancies.

But, all that being said, my money is still on the big, reputable contests. Where, for $20-$35 can we get a thorough breakdown (most of the time) on our first 15-20 pages of work? And from 2-5 different judges? This is money well spent.

We can't throw that crying baby out with the wash water. We need to glean what we can from the judges' comments. Take what we want, pitch the rest, but remember one thing before we complain: Editors and agents will be as diverse as the judges and so will readers and reviewers.
This won't be our last experience with criticism, not by a long shot.

Happy writing, happy contests!


  1. Great reminder, Linda! I get the high and low judging thing fairly often, it seems. But there is ALWAYS something I can learn. Even from the judges who aren't well trained (that, of course, would be the low-scoring ones - right? ::wink::).

    Still SO excited for ya, my friend.

  2. It's so very subjective. I've heard more comments this year, I think, than ever before. Not sure why. I do wish there was a class offered at ACFW conference to address this very thing, maybe literally teach people how to judge. Wouldn't that be a great class?

  3. Thank you for this gentle reminder. A fellow writer was frustrated with a score of 90 and a score of 50. I am praying mine will be more consistent but I will think of this post if it isn't!

  4. Very true. Despite the varying opinions, I've received some great feedback from contest judges.